America must return to conservative principles of less government,reduced taxes, less spending and a balanced budget!
Cut,cap and balance!
Search This Blog
Friday, November 25, 2016
Cut-off of federal funds to sanctuary cities is possible immediately
upon inauguration of President Trump
Thanks to a little noticed action of Texas congressman John Culberson taken last July, President-Elect Trump will able to cut off federal law enforcement funding to nine sanctuary cities, plus the entire state of California, immediately upon taking the oath of office.
Because of the foresight of a Texas Congressman, President Trump will be able to end certain funding to the largest sanctuary cities plus the entire state of California on his first day as President. Working quietly, Culberson convinced the existing Justice Department to certify those cities as non-compliant with federal law, thereby making them vulnerable to loss of money from Washington.
With great foresight, the congressman, as he explained to Eric Shawn of Fox News(video embedded below):
… using existing law and the power of the purse, I have seen to it that the top 10 sanctuary cities in America have already been certified as violating existing federal law and therefore everything is pre-positioned for these 10 cities - including Chicago, New York, the entire state of California - they will lose all their federal law enforcement money, if President Trump chooses to, the president can cut off their money at noon on January 20th of 2017. If they do not change their sanctuary policies and hand over criminal illegal aliens in their custody to be deported, their days of receiving federal law enforcement money are over.
SHAWN: Obviously this is something that the Obama administration has not agreed with.
CULBERSON: In fact I, as chairman of the subcommittee in charge of all the money for the Department of Justice, I quietly persuaded Attorney General Loretta Lynch to implement this new policy this past July seventh, so it's already done. I did it as subcommittee chairman using existing law and the influence of the power of the purse that the founding fathers so wisely entrusted to Congress. I did it quietly and and thoughtfully, and I didn't embarrass anybody so it's already done, pre-positioned.
SHAWN: I'm sorry - pre-positioned but hasn't gone into action?
CULBERSON: Attorney General Lynch has already notified every city and state in the country that unless they cooperate 100 percent of the time with requests for immigration information about criminal aliens in local custody, then those local jurisdictions lose all their federal law enforcement money. That's already up on the Department of Justice website. It has been official policy since July seventh. I just didn't make any noise about it because the purpose of this election - America wants us to get it done, to get the job done, so I've taken care of it the job is done and President Trump can now cut off their money at noon on January 20th because it's been policy.
You might wonder how Congressman Culberson "persuaded" A.G. Lynch. Good old arm-twisting, based on the power of the purse:
Citing his committee's power over the DOJ's budget, Culberson stated in February:
Any refusal by the Department to comply with these reasonable and timely requests will factor heavily in my consideration of their 2017 budget requests, and whether or not I will include language in the fiscal year 2017 CJS appropriations bill prohibiting the award of law enforcement grants to jurisdictions that harbor illegal aliens. I will include language in this year's bill requiring the DOJ to amend the application process for Byrne JAG, COPS, and SCAAP grants so that grantees must certify under oath that they are in compliance with section 1373 of title 8 of the United States Code.
Master showman Donald Trump thus has the opportunity for a lot of drama upon taking his oath. Such a dramatic move as announcing the cut-off of law enforcement grants to the ten large jurisdictions would immediately place the left on defense, for:
… a November Rasmussen poll found that large majority of voters favors deportation of illegal alien criminals: