If Obama runs against Congress, how does he explain the Senate? | Examiner Editorial | Editorials | Washington Examiner

Among the most amazing aspects of the 2012 presidential campaign is the severe amnesia spreading like the Black Plague through the liberal ranks of the mainstream media. The great gasbags of this brand of thinking – The New York Times and The Washington Post – seemed to lose all connection with political reality over the New Years weekend. Political health experts are baffled about the origins of this affliction, but anecdotal evidence suggests it strikes journalists whose intoxication with statist solutions prompts them to protect readers from inconvenient facts about President Obama and other incumbent Democrats. (There is a variation of the syndrome that breaks out among some conservative think tanks when Republicans run the government) 

Take, for example, the Post's story on Sunday by David Nakamura in which unnamed senior Obama campaign aides made clear that, “as he enters his reelection campaign year, Obama intends to ‘double down’ on his outside strategy, pressing the message that he is fighting for the middle class against a Congress beholden to special interests.” The Obama aides apparently went on and on in that vein without challenge from the Post reporter. Nakamura evidently forgot to ask the Obama aides why their boss never publicly challenged Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and the Democratic Senate majority to stop smothering the two dozen job-creation bills sent over by the Republican House, even as the nation’s unemployment and underemployment rates remained in the red zone.



Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2012/01/if-obama-runs-against-congress-how-does-he-explain-senate/2053286#ixzz1iKEJhIqX






Link to article:If Obama runs against Congress, how does he explain the Senate? | Examiner Editorial | Editorials | Washington Examiner