Killing bin Laden is not a foreign policy | WashingtonExaminer.com

Killing bin Laden is not a foreign policy | WashingtonExaminer.com#.UIUfXsXA--0#.UIUfXsXA--0#.UIUfXsXA--0

Osama bin Laden is dead, but President Obama is determined not to let him rest. The bearded terrorist who once led al Qaeda has become, for Obama and his surrogates, a bumper-sticker slogan to be trotted out at campaign events -- a symbol of the supposed success of his administration's foreign policy.

"Osama bin Laden is dead, General Motors is alive," is how Vice President Biden put it at the Democratic convention.

In a joking reference to Monday night's debate, President Obama said at last week's Al Smith dinner: "Spoiler alert: We got Bin Laden."

On ABC's "This Week," former White House green jobs czar Van Jones called his old boss a "towering figure in foreign policy: You've got somebody with a Nobel Peace Prize and he killed bin Laden." The administration has also leaked details of the raid and cooperated in the making of a Hollywood movie on the raid that is due later this year.

Those of us at The Washington Examiner fist-pumped like everyone else when we heard the news that the SEALs had taken out bin Laden. But is this a grand foreign policy triumph for the ages? We don't think so, especially given recent events. And one successful assassination does not a coherent foreign policy make.

Obama deserves credit for making the right call, but let's be honest: It was not a uniquely tough call to make. As "Black Hawk Down" author Mark Bowden wrote in Foreign Policy magazine: "[N]early all the [administration] principals favored sending in the SEALs at their final meeting on the topic, three days before the raid. The biggest exception was Vice President Biden, who was the only one who urged the president not to attack the Abbottabad compound ... yet." It can't be that hard to choose when a room full of experts says "Yes!" and Biden says "No!"